2001-08-20 CC MinutesCity of Farmers Branch
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
City Hall Plaza
13000 William Dodson Parkway
Farmers Branch, Texas
Monday, August 20, 2001
7:30 p.m.
The following members of the City Council were present:
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Deputy Mayor Tem
Councilmembers
Bob Phelps
Calla Davis
Charlie Bird
Jim Robbs
Paul Walden
Bill Moses
The following members of the City Administration were present:
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant to City Manager
Assistant to City Manager
City Attorney
City Secretary
Finance Director
Communications Director
Director of Community Services
City Engineer
Director of Parks & Recreation
Library Director
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Director of Public Works
Director of Equipment Services
Recording Secretary
Richard L. Escalante
Linda Groomer
John Burke
John Roach
Margaret Somereve
John Boyle
Cindee Peters
Charles Cox
Tom Bryson
Michael Spicer
Jerry Murawski
Jeff Fuller
Mary Jane Stevenson
Jim Fawcett
Kyle King
Mark Pavageaux
Don Moore
Suzanne Reynolds
Mayor Pro Tem Davis called the City Council meeting of August 20, 2001, to
order at 7:30 p.m. The meeting was televised.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated Mayor Phelps had to leave unexpectedly and would
return shortly.
Volume 87, page 1
- i
i
A.1 INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
Councilman Bird gave the invocation and Councilman Moses led the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
A.2 CONSIDER ACCEPTING HISTORICAL PARK DONATIONS FOR THE
SECOND QUARTER 2000/2001 AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis presented the following information. The Historical
Preservation and Restoration Board have approved several donations to be added
to the inventory. Ron Doerler, Chair of the Historical Preservation and
Restoration Board, presented the following items for Council approval.
A framed advertisement of a 1937 Studebaker, Motor's Auto Repair Manual,
Craftsman wrench, two tire tools, and an oil pump from Mr. Sam McIntyre of
Farmers Branch.
A motion by Councilman Walden, seconded by Councilman Moses, all voting
"aye," accepted second quarter donations to the Historical Park.
1
A.3 CONSIDER ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF A CHERRY WOOD, INLAID
TABLE FROM THE FARMERS BRANCH DANCE CLUB FOR USE AT THE
SENIOR CENTER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis presented the following information. The Farmers Branch
Dance Club programs a dance for seniors every Monday night at the Senior
Center. Attendance for the very popular dances averages about 270.
Buford Watson, President of the Farmers Branch Dance Club, was present to
donate an imported, cherry wood, inlaid table to be used during admission at
Monday night dances at the Senior Center. The table will be available for other
uses by the Senior Center as needed. The purchase price for the table was
approximately $1,000.
Mr. Watson thanked the Mayor and City Council for the Senior Center and for all
the other facilities in Farmers Branch. He stated the Council does an excellent job
for the residents and hopes they keep up the good work.
Katie Roberts, 13240 Kerr, read a letter that she wrote to Buford and Corina
Watson and fellow dance club members thanking them for the beautiful table.
She also thanked the City Council for their involvement with the seniors and
applauds their efforts.
C
A motion by Councilman Bird, seconded by Councilman Moses, all voting "aye,"
accepted the donation of an imported, cherry wood, inlaid table for the Senior
Center, with appropriate plaque.
Volume 87, page 2
A.4 PRESENTATION OF BOARD APPLICATIONS.
There were no applications presented.
A.5 REPORT ON STUDY SESSION ITEMS.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis and the City Council gave a brief summary of the items
discussed in Study Session prior to the regular meeting.
Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated Mayor Phelps was back in attendance.
B.0 CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS CONSENT ITEMS AND TAKE THE
APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Kathleen Matsumura, 3938 Clubway Lane, asked that Agenda Item B.9 be
removed from the agenda.
Betty Supinski, 13232 Kerr Trail, stated she had a question regarding Agenda
Item B.1 minutes from July 16, 2001 City Council meeting.
After some discussion about the minutes it was determined they were correct as
written.
A motion by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, seconded by Councilman Moses, all voting
"aye," removed Agenda Item B.9 from Consent Agenda.
A motion by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, seconded by Councilman Moses, all voting
"aye," approved the Consent Agenda as amended.
B.1 APPROVED MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 16,
2001.
B.2 APPROVED MINUTES OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
AUGUST 7, 2001.
B.3 APPROVED THE REQUEST BY PRECISION LANDSCAPE
MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR FINAL PLAT OF PRECISION
LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, INC. ADDITION.
r
B.4. APPROVED THE REQUEST OF DAVID MEINHARDT FOR SITE
PLAN, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING VARIANCE, FOR AN
APPROXIMATE 46,763 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
BUILDING ON A 3.2 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 13755 HUTTON
Volume 87, page 3
DRIVE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HUTTON COURT AND
HUTTON DRIVE WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 22
ZONING DISTRICT.
B.5 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-077 AMENDING THE 2000-2001
OPERATING BUDGET OF THE NORTH DALLAS COUNTY WATER
SUPPLY CORPORATION.
B.6 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-079 APPROVING THE 2001-2002
OPERATING BUDGET OF THE NORTH DALLAS COUNTY WATER
SUPPLY CORPORATION.
B.7 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-078 DESIGNATING AN
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR THE NORTH DALLAS COUNTY
WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO ACCEPT A LETTER OF AGREEMENT FOR AUDIT
SERVICES AS APPROVED BY THE CORPORATION.
B.8 ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2001-083 AMENDING THE CITY'S
INVESTMENT POLICY.
B.9 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-083 AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PERSONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH FRANK BROWN OF BROWN ROOFING FOR
INSTALLATION OF A NEW ROOF ON THE QUEEN ANNE VICTORIAN
COTTAGE IN THE HISTORICAL PARK AND TAKE APPROPRIATE
ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The roof that is currently on
the Queen Anne Victorian Cottage is in need of repair. The wood shingle roof
was originally installed in 1992 and is developing areas where the shingles are
curling, potentially exposing the interior of the structure to damage. Both
Building Maintenance staff and the Historical Park's restoration consultant agree
that it is advisable to replace the entire roof. If the entire roof is not replaced it
will be necessary to make spot repairs as necessary, ultimately replacing the entire
roof. It will be more cost efficient to replace the entire roof at one time.
Brown Roofing specializes in wood shingle roofing and roofing historic structures
and has done excellent work for the Historical Park. Brown Roofing is the roofer
recommended by the restoration consultant Leeds Clark.
Proper roofing repairs are necessary to adequately protect the historic structure
and its valuable contents. City Code also requires that the shingles be treated with
a fire retardant, which Brown Roofing has specified in their proposal. The
project will cost $20,380. Funds are available in the Historical Park building
maintenance account to complete this work.
Volume 87, page 4
The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department recommends adopting
Resolution No. 2001-083 authorizing the City Manager to execute a personal
services agreement with Frank Brown of Brown Roofing for installation of a new
roof on the Queen Anne Victorian Cottage in the Historical Park in an amount not
to exceed $20,380.
Kathleen Matsumura, 3938 Clubway Lane, stated she is very supportive of the
Historical Park. She stated her concern is why the roof of Queen Anne Victorian
Cottage is in need of repair.
Jeff Harting, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director, stated the roof is
approximately nine years old and the shingles are curling. He stated the City's
consultants and building staff have advised that the roof needs to be replaced.
Ms. Matsumura asked what kind of roof would it be. Mr. Harting replied wood
shingle roof. Ms. Matsumura asked if that was not against the Farmers Branch
ordinance. Mr. Harting replied wood shingle roofs have to be class B in the UL
listing required by Uniform Building Code. He also stated the singles will be
treated with fire retardant.
Ms. Matsumura asked about the funding. Mr. Harting replied the funds are from
Hotel/Motel Funds.
Ms. Matsumura asked what the cost would be. Mr. Harting replied $20,380. Ms.
Matsumura asked if this item went out for bids. Mr. Harting replied no, Mr.
Brown specializes in this type of work on historical structures. Ms. Matsumura
asked if there are no other companies that do this type of work. Mr. Harting
stated Mr. Brown is the best-qualified person to do this type work. He stated the
City has had problems with this structure before and other companies that have
worked on the structure have not been able to solve the problems. Ms.
Matsumura asked who initially installed the roof on the structure. Mr. Harting
replied Crawford Construction Company. Ms. Matsumura asked if Crawford
Construction Company is doing business with the City now. Mr. Harting replied
not to his knowledge.
Councilman Walden asked Mr. Harting if the City would be getting a warranty on
the roof. Mr. Harting replied he assumes the City would get a warranty but does
not have the information with him but he would check into it.
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, asked what the square footage was
on the structure at the Historical Park was. Mr. Harting replied approximately
900 square feet. Ms. Gatcomb stated she would like to recommended Aurelio
Torres who would do an excellent job and charge the City less for putting the roof
on the Queen Anne Victorian Cottage.
Volume 87, page 5
Mayor Pro Tern Davis stated if Mr. Torres would like to work for the City he
needs to fill out a form and be put on the bid list. She stated there are certain
specifications that the City is responsible for that have to be done.
Councilman Walden stated on this size contract the City is not going to expend
any additional expenses or staff time. He stated the City is familiar with Mr.
Brown's work on other historic structures.
Richard Escalante, City Manager, stated this is a historic structure, which presents
unique challenges to reconstruct the roof in a historic and accurate manner. This
is the reason the City is awarding the contract to Brown Roofing
Mr. Harting stated the emphasis is to maintain the historic integrity of this
structure and to insure that the work is done in a proper manner.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Robbs, seconded by
Mayor Pro Tern Davis, all voting "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-083
authorizing the City Manager to execute a personal services agreement with Frank
Brown of Brown Roofing for installation of a new roof on the Queen Anne
Victorian Cottage in the Historical Park in an amount not to exceed $20,380.
C.I PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF BRYAN DAVENPORT
TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 27 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
ZONING DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SPRING VALLEY ROAD AND INWOOD ROAD, TO ALLOW HIGH
DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL USES AND TAKE
APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps stated that the applicant has asked that this item be withdrawn from
the Agenda.
A motion by Councilman Walden, seconded by Councilman Robbs, all voting
"aye," approved the request to withdraw the zoning application from the Agenda
without prejudice.
C.2 THIS ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT: PUBLIC
HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 2619 AMENDING
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH,
APPENDIX B, THOROUGHFARE PLAN, AND AMENDING THE CITY-
WIDE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 2532 BY
CHANGING LAKE DRIVE FROM FOUR-LANE UNDIVIDED TO FOUR-
LANE DIVIDED; CHANGING CROWN DRIVE AND A PORTION OF
MATHIS DRIVE FROM FOUR-LANE DIVIDED TO FOUR-LANE
UNDIVIDED; AND DELETING MANHATTAN DRIVE.
Volume 87, page 6
Mayor Phelps stated in a letter dated August 13, 2001, the applicant asked that the
proposed change be withdrawn. At the August 13, 2001 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting, the Commission accepted Basic Capital Management's
request to withdraw.
A motion by Councilman Bird, seconded by Councilman Moses, all voting "aye,"
accepted the request to withdraw this item from the agenda.
D.1 CONSIDER REQUEST OF DENNIS REDWINE TO DISCUSS HOMEOWNER
CONCERNS REGARDING PD-79 AND THE BRANCH CROSSING
PROJECT.
Dennis Redwine, 2624 Dixiana, gave a lengthy presentation on Branch Crossing.
He reviewed the stated goals according to PD-79. Mr. Redwine stated he felt that
these goals were not being met.
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, stated she has concerns about the
way the City Council approached the development of Branch Crossing.
Mayor Phelps stated there would be no out breaks during the Council meeting.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, stated her concerns about Branch
Crossing including too many lights and the purchasing and bulldozing of homes.
She stated she felt the City could have been more innovative in trying to help the
residents. She also stated she was concerned about the builders not being certified
builders.
Betty Supinski, 13232 Kerr Trail, stated at a Council meeting of June 2, 1997,
Council approved a Community Development Block Grant. She asked what the
criteria for the use of these funds would be, specifically if it were used to improve
the street and sidewalk in the area. She commented that she understood that the
new sewer line had been put in front of the homes and that existing homeowners
had to pay to get on the new line. She stated she would like clarification on the
grant program.
Richard Escalante, City Manager, stated the sewer lines are in the back of the
homes. He detailed the program to improve the sewer system in Branch Crossing
and stated that the residents requested sewer improvements at early neighborhood
meetings, and stated that the existing homeowners are connected to the sewer
system.
Jerry Murawski, City Engineer, stated the City Manager was correct and he
reviewed the improvements that were made to the sewer lines and the installation
of new water lines in the area beginning in 1989.
Volume 87, page 7
Carla Williams, 2621 Dixiana, stated she would like to know in the event her
property was totally destroyed under what conditions of PD-79 could she rebuild.
Mr. Escalante explained prior to the adoption of PD-79 many of the homes in the
area were legal non-conforming uses. Should one of those homes be destroyed,
the owner would have to go to the Zoning Board of Adjustments for permission to
rebuild their home or they would have to build a larger home. With the adoption
of PD-79, all homes were made legal-conforming uses. Now should a house be
destroyed, the owner would not have to go before the board to obtain a variance to
rebuild their home.
Ms. Williams stated her disappointment with Branch Crossing is that it is not
keeping up with the character of the neighborhood in regard to the type of new
homes being built today. She also asked if Tom Field was going to be resurfaced
and would like some clarification.
Mayor Phelps explained that if the resurfacing had been done prior to the medians
being built, the new surface would have had to be dug out for the new landscaping
and medians. He stated that resurfacing only replaces the top one or two inches of
asphalt.
Ms. Williams commented she feels there has been enough development in Branch
Crossing and any new high-end development should be done on the west side of
town.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis admonished recent presentations by a group of citizens in
regard to the criticism of City boards and staff, and the pay-as-you-go program.
Mayor Pro Tem Davis stated that Branch Crossing is an excellent project and it is
unfortunate that some of the residents do not care for the improvements.
Mr. Redwine stated the City Council and some of the residents of Branch
Crossing have a difference of opinion for what is best in their neighborhood.
Ms. Supinski detailed some election issues.
Councilman Walden responded to Mr. Redwine's presentation explaining that he
feels that Farmers Branch needs to provide a good mix of residential property. He
supports Branch Crossing and does not believe that anyone is being forced out of
the neighborhood.
D.2 CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 2615 APPROVING GAS RATES
FOR TXU GAS COMPANY AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The City has original
jurisdiction over TXU Gas Distribution's rates and services within the city limits.
Volume 87, page 8
This does not include jurisdiction over the cost of natural gas which is a cost
passed through directly to the customer. It was this cost that caused bills to be so
high this past winter.
On February 16, 2001, TXU Gas Distribution filed a request to increase rates
effective March 23, 2001. The City Council passed Ordinance No.2590 on March
19, 2001 suspending the effective date for 90 days or until June 20, 2001.
Because the review of the rate proposal was not completed, TXU extended the
effective date until August 24, 2001. Farmers Branch participated with 22 other
affected cities of the Northwest Metro/Mid Cities Distribution System in a review
of the reasonableness of the TXU request. The cities hired consultants to review
the rates for reasonableness.
TXU filed a request for an increase of $10.16 million from the 22 cities
customers. Through the work of the coalition of cities and the consultants, TXU
agreed to an increase of only $5.15 million dollars. Should TXU not agree with
the rate set by the City the rates can be appealed to the Railroad Commission.
The proposed residential base monthly charge for Farmers Branch will increase
from $5.00 to $7.00 and the overall bill including gas consumption and gas cost
adjustment will increase 5.6%. Commercial customers will also see an increase in
their monthly charge from $10 to $12 per month and an additional 1.57% increase
in their bills.
Staff recommends adopting Ordinance No. 2615 approving gas rates for TXU Gas
Company.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked if the Public Utility Commission
had the final say about rate increases.
John Boyle, City Attorney, stated gas rates goes to the Railroad Commission and
electric rates goes to the Public Utility Commission.
Ms. Crockett asked if they have petitioned the Railroad Commission for any kind
of increase anywhere else in Texas. Mr. Boyle replied the City has the original
jurisdiction; the City will pass an ordinance and if the gas company is dissatisfied
they can appeal to the Railroad Commission. Ms. Crocket asked if the City had a
franchise agree with TXU. Mr. Boyle replied yes.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, seconded
by Councilman Bird, all voting "aye," adopted the following captioned Ordinance
No. 2615 approving TXU Gas rates.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS,
FINDING AFTER REASONABLE NOTICE AND HEARING, THAT
TXU GAS DISTRIBUTION'S RATES AND CHARGES WITHIN THE
Volume 87, page 9
CITY SHOULD BE CHANGED; DETERMINING JUST AND
REASONABLE RATES; ADOPTING GENERAL SERVICE RATES
INCLUDING RATE ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS AND
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES TO BE CHARGED FOR
SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS TO
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS;
PROVIDING FOR RECOVERY OF RATE CASE EXPENSES;
PRESERVING REGULATORY RIGHTS OF THE CITY; PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
D.3 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-081 AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
AGREEMENT WITH GALLAGHER CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FOR THE NEW FARMERS BRANCH RECREATION CENTER
AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. There is $8,000,000 budgeted
in the Non-Bond Capital Improvement Program for the new Farmers Branch
Recreation Center. To date a master plan has been completed and adopted, the
architect is working on schematic diagrams, and a grant has been submitted to the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for $750,000 in matching funds.
During the February 19, 2001 Study Session, staff discussed the Recreation
Center project with Council and advised Council of the desire to hire Gallagher
Construction Management Services as the Construction Manager for the project.
Gallagher Construction Manager was the construction manager for the Senior
Center and for the completion of the Justice Center, and performed well on both.
Likewise, Gallagher has a positive history of working with the City and with other
cities and school districts, as well. Gallagher's strengths are project coordination
and bringing projects in on schedule.
Gallagher's proposed contract amount of $553,000 is 8.4% of the estimated
$6,556,000 construction budget.
The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department recommends adopting
Resolution No. 2001-081 authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction
manager agreement with Gallagher Construction Management Services for the
new Farmers Branch Recreation Center in an amount not to exceed $553,000 plus
reimbursable expenses.
Mayor Phelps stated Gallagher Construction did the City's Senior Center under
budget and ahead of schedule without any problems. Gallagher also took over
completing the Justice Center after many problems. Mayor Phelps stated hiring
Volume 87, page 10
Gallagher Construction Management Services as the Construction Manager would
save the City money.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked if other municipalities used this
same procedure and how much under budget was the construction of the Senior
Center.
Richard Escalante, City Manager, stated the City revised the program several
times based on the architect's drawings. He stated once the construction manager
began doing the work the project went smoothly.
Jeff Fuller, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated when the revisions were
started the estimate was $4.2 million, and after completion it was approximately
$4.1 million; he would have to check the budget.
Mr. Escalante asked Mr. Fuller if the construction manager started as early on the
Senior Center project. Mr. Fuller replied the City did not get the construction
manager until midway through the process.
Mr. Escalante stated the construction manager is involved by working with the
architect on reviews and engineering.
Ms. Crockett asked if Gallagher's contract was going to be more.
Mr. Fuller replied the contract with Gallagher would be more than what the
Senior Center contract was because the Recreation Center project is double what
the Senior Center was. Mr. Fuller also stated in response to the question about
other municipalities using construction managers, the cities of Grapevine and
Arlington have both used Gallagher and have recommended him.
Councilman Walden stated to Ms. Crockett that on a percentage basis this project
is 8.4 percent where as the senior center project was 11.6%
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Robbs, seconded by
Councilman Bird, all voting "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-081 authorizing
the City Manager to execute a construction manager agreement with Gallagher
Construction Management Services for the new Farmers Branch Recreation
Center in an amount not to exceed $553,000 plus reimbursable expenses.
D.4 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-061 AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS FOR VARIOUS
SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
AT SENLAC SERVICE CENTER, LOCATED AT 13333 SENLAC AND TAKE
APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Volume 87, page 11
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. Over the past several months,
the City has been dealing with environmental concerns at the City's Senlac
Service Center. Additional environmental investigations are needed to further
address environmental concerns, ensure compliance with any applicable
regulatory requirements, and determine employee safety requirements for
operational and maintenance activities such as underground utility installation or
repair. The proposed environmental investigations will provide information that
may identify possible limitations, modifications, or increased costs associated
with future construction or expansion plans at the Senlac Service Center.
The environmental investigations proposed at Senlac Service Center include a
geophysical survey, a soil vapor survey, subsurface investigation, and a risk
evaluation report. Staff proposes to enter into an agreement with Earth
Measurement Corporation to conduct the geophysical survey; and EA
Engineering, Inc. is proposed to conduct the soil vapor survey, subsurface
investigation, and risk evaluation. Coast-to-Coast Analytical Specialists, Inc. is
proposed to perform the soil vapor analyses, and Anachem, Inc. is proposed to
perform the soil analyses. In addition, an unknown quantity of solid waste will be
generated from the soil borings at the site, and the solid waste will require proper
disposal by a licensed waste disposal company. Staff will obtain quotes from
waste disposal companies after the quantity and classification of the soil is
known.
Staff reviewed proposals from nine environmental and laboratory contractors.
Staff recommends accepting four of the proposals and contracting with each of
the companies to complete the project at an estimated total cost between $85,646
and $105,446. The proposals from the four contractors and the anticipated solid
waste disposal are estimated to cost $85,646. Due to the likely prospect of
encountering unknown environmental factors that could result in additional costs,
proposed Resolution No. 2001-061 is written to authorize the City Manager to
approve change orders with the contractors, if necessary, up to a maximum total
contracts cost not to exceed $105,446. Funds are available in the non-bond
Capital Improvements Program fund for the Senlac Service Center.
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, asked if the investigations would be
done under the guidance of the Environmental Protection Agency, and which
agency sets the standards.
Richard Escalante, City Manager, stated this is work that the City has initiated
and would report any findings to appropriate authorities.
Al Black, Environmental Health Manager, stated the City has been in contact with
the TNRCC regarding the investigation of the property.
Ms. Gatcomb asked if it would be the EPA or the TNRCC. Mr. Black replied the
TNRCC. Ms. Gatcomb asked if there would be any reason to involve the Corps
Volume 87, page 12
of Engineers, EPA, or FEMA. Mr. Black replied not at this time but if the City
finds anything that requires notification to these agencies, the City will do so.
Ms. Gatcomb asked if the City was following guidelines of the TNRCC. Mr.
Black replied yes in regards to the possible location of municipal solid waste on
the property. The other steps of the investigation are voluntary. At this time the
focus is on the workers at the site and for future construction on this site.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked how much money was budgeted
for this project.
Mayor Phelps replied up to $105,446 and a minimum of $85,646. Ms. Crockett
asked how much has the City spent in regards to environmental studies at Senlac.
Mr. Black replied he did not have the figures available but estimated
approximately $50,000.
Ms. Crockett asked if the City was going to build a new Service Center on this
site. Mayor Phelps replied the City would either remodel or add onto the
building.
Richard Escalante, City Manager, stated in the long term the City would need
additional buildings, either on this site or at another site.
Ms. Crockett asked if the project included improvements to the Animal Shelter.
Mr. Escalante responded that had not yet been discussed.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Walden, seconded by
Councilman Robbs, all voting, "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-061
authorizing the City Manager to approve change orders with the contractors, if
necessary, up to a maximum total contract cost not to exceed $105,446. Funds
are available in the non-bond Capital Improvements Program fund for the Senlac
Service Center.
D.5 CONSIDER ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 2626 AMENDING THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 42, FLOODS, ARTICLE II, FLOOD DAMAGE
PREVENTION, DIVISION 1, GENERALLY, SECTION 42-37, BASIS FOR
ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS; RELATIVE
TO ADOPTING THE AMENDED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND REPEALING
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The City of Farmers Branch
participates in the National Flood Insurance Program in order for residents to be
eligible to purchase flood insurance underwritten by the federal government. The
Federal Emergency Management Agency, known as FEMA, is administrator of
the flood insurance program and publishes the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The
map is used by insurance companies and mortgage companies to determine the
Volume 87, page 13
rate that residents pay for flood insurance and by the City to regulate activities
within the 100-year flood plain.
FEMA recently published an updated map. The map was last published in 1990.
The updated map reflects map amendments and map revisions submitted by
property owners and approved by FEMA since 1990.
A map amendment is a correction to the Flood Insurance Rate Map. When the
rate map does not accurately depict the location of the 100-year floodplain, a
property owner can submit to FEMA detailed survey information prepared by a
licensed surveyor to FEMA requesting that the map be amended to accurately
depict the location of the 100-year floodplain. If approved, the amendment is
incorporated into the Flood Insurance Rate Map. Since 1990, there were nine
amendments approved by FEMA and included in the updated map. One
amendment was on commercial property; eight were on single-family residential
properties.
A map revision is the alteration of the location or elevation of the 100-year
floodplain. The process that a property owner must follow to alter the location or
elevation of the 100-year floodplain by construction includes submission of
design plans and hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer
that demonstrate that the alteration will not adversely affect adjacent properties by
increasing the velocity or elevation of the 100-year flood. The design and
hydraulic analyses are reviewed by FEMA, the City, and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, when applicable. There were nine map revisions approved by FEMA
and included in the updated map. Two revisions were on single-family residential
properties, two on multi-family residential properties, and four on commercial
properties.
A map revision can also result from updated hydrologic and hydraulic studies of
all or portions of a creek that show that the location and elevation of the 100-year
floodplain has changed. Licensed professional engineers must perform the
studies. Since 1990 there were not any updated studies performed on any of the
City's creeks. The City has budgeted funds to update the Rawhide Creek study
this year and the Farmers Branch Creek study in 2002. The Rawhide Creek study
will begin later this year after the City's new topographic maps are received. Each
study will take approximately one year to complete. Review and approval by
FEMA is expected to take an additional six to twelve months.
The updated Flood Insurance Rate Map is a small-scale map and may be difficult
to read on the City's website. FEMA has indicated that the map in electronic
format should be available later this year. Until then, a copy of the map can be
viewed or purchased at City Hall in the Engineering Department.
The City Engineer recommends approval of Ordinance No. 2626 amending the
Code of Ordinances, Chapter 42, Floods, Article II, Flood Damage Prevention,
Volume 87, page 14
Division 1, Generally, Section 42-37, Basis for Establishing the Areas of Special
Flood Hazards; relative to adopting the amended Flood Insurance Rate Map;
providing a severability clause and repealing conflicting ordinances.
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, asked if the improvements to the Ken
Rymer Park, Epps Field, Courtyard, Parkside Apartments, and Oakbrook
improvements would require FEMA approval.
Jerry Murawski, City Engineer, replied on the Oakbrook development, since the
dredging takes place below the surface of the water this does not involve
reporting it to FEMA. He stated there is a letter of map revision for Epps Field.
Courtyard is not near the flood plain, and Parkside Apartments has already been
incorporated into the FEMA maps. He stated it was incorporated in
approximately 1993 and 1997.
Ms. Gatcomb asked how many maps were revised. Mr. Murawski replied nine
maps were revised and nine maps have amendments.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Bird, seconded by
Councilman Moses, all voting "aye," adopted the following captioned Ordinance
No. 2626 amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 42, Floods, Article II, Flood
Damage Prevention, Division 1, Generally, Section 42-37, Basis for Establishing
the Areas of Special Flood Hazards; relative to adopting the amended Flood
Insurance Rate Map; providing a severability clause and repealing conflicting
ordinances.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 42, FLOODS,
ARTICLE II, FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION, DIVISION 1,
GENERALLY, SECTION 42-37, BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE
AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARDS; RELATIVE TO
ADOPTING THE AMENDED FLOOD 12*4URANCE RATE MAP;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND REPEALING
CONFLICTING ORDINANCES.
D.6 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-086 APPROVING A
CONGESTION MITIGATION AIR QUALITY FUNDING AGREEMENT
WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE
IH35E CORRIDOR MONITORING PROJECT AND TAKE APPROPRIATE
ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The IH35E Corridor
Monitoring Project will expand the capability of the Traffic Engineering Division
to monitor traffic conditions and respond to traffic problems via improved traffic
signal timing and motorist information. The project is included in the DART
Local Assistance Program Budget. A portion of the funding for the project is
Volume 87, page 15
being provided by the Texas Department of Transportation. Approval of the
proposed congestion mitigation air quality funding agreement will allow the
Texas Department of Transportation to reimburse the City for their share of the
proj ect.
The project will include upgrading existing traffic monitoring camera sites, new
traffic monitoring cameras, additional motorist information displays, wireless
traffic signal data communications, wireless school zone beacon communications
and control, linking the City Traffic Operations Center, and a thoroughfare travel
time monitoring system.
The total cost of the project is estimated to be $554,600 with the Texas
Department of Transportation reimbursement to be $383,595. The City's share of
the project is approximately $171,005. The project is included in the DART
Local Assistance Program Budget in the amount of $555,000.
Traffic Engineer recommends the adoption of Resolution No. 2001-086 approving
a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding agreement with the Texas
Department of Transportation for the IH35E Corridor Monitoring Project.
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, stated she is glad the State is
reimbursing the City for some of the expense.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked if this project included more
cameras for traffic monitoring and air quality monitoring devices. Dave Davis,
Traffic Engineer, replied it does include more additional monitoring cameras but
not air quality monitoring equipment. Ms. Crockett stated the agenda item
included air quality. Mr. Davis replied it was the name of the State program. Ms.
Crockett asked if the City contributed to the monitoring of air quality. Mr. Davis
replied the City Traffic Department does not do any air quality testing and does
not intend to in this program.
Ms. Crockett asked if it was necessary to have more cameras at intersections.
Mayor Phelps responded this is an area wide program and will be used to monitor
traffic better to detect problems and to reroute traffic around accidents to make
traffic smoother.
Mr. Davis stated the City is trying to make traffic controls more responsive to
traffic conditions.
Ms. Crockett brought up a problem at the intersection of Tom Field and Valley
View Lane regarding the length of the light at various times of the day. Mr. Davis
replied the City would look at the problem and get back with her.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Moses, seconded by
Councilman Bird, all voting "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-086 086
Volume 87, page 16
approving a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding agreement with the Texas
Department of Transportation for the IH35E Corridor Monitoring Project.
D.7 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-063 AWARDING THE BID
FOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
MAYBROOK DRIVE SCREEN WALL TO NORTHSTAR CONSTRUCTION
AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The 2000-2001 Non-bond
Capital Improvement Program Amended Budget provides $195,000 for replacing
the screen wall along Maybrook Drive and repair and painting of the screen wall
along Farmers Branch Lane, which has been completed. The improvements
include removing the existing screen wall, repairing the concrete channel,
installing inlets and storm sewer pipe, and constructing a new screen wall. The
project was previously bid along with the screen wall replacement between Josey
Lane and Baymeadow Circle in March 2001. The low bid exceeded the available
funds by $84,300, and the bids were rejected. The project has been rebid to be
constructed under two separate contracts. One contract, which is this agenda
item, is the drainage improvements. Another contract, which is another item on
this council agenda, is the installation of the new screen walls along Maybrook
Drive and between Josey Lane and Baymeadow Circle.
After expenditures for design, geotechnical investigation, material testing, and
repair and painting of the screen wall along Farmers Branch Lane, there is
$164,050 available for construction.
Four bids were received and opened on July 3, 2001. All bids met specifications.
The low bid was submitted by Northstar Construction, Inc. in an amount of
$113,850. Northstar Construction has provided adequate qualifications and
references for similar work. The contract time is 90 calendar days. By rebidding
the improvements under two separate contacts, the cost of the improvements was
reduced $35,235 from the March 2001 bid.
The City Engineer recommends adopting Resolution No. 2001-063 awarding the
bid for the Maybrook Drive Wall Improvements, Grading and Drainage to
Northstar Construction, Inc. in the amount of $113,850.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked if D.7 and D.8 Agenda Items were
together the last time they were bid. Mr. Escalante replied yes.
Ruth Alhilali, 2901 N. Sunbeck Circle, stated this project calls for drainage
improvements and asked what the improvements would be. Jerry Murawski, City
Engineer, replied the first aspect is reconstructing the channel that is there; the
second aspect is doing grading work and installing inlets to allow the water to go
into the channel.
Volume 87, page 17
Mayor Pro Tem Davis asked if the wall would help the lady that came to the
Town Hall meetings. Mr. Murawski replied the screening wall is the next agenda
item and he would explain then.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Bird, seconded by
Mayor Pro Tem Davis, all voting, "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-063
awarding the bid for the Maybrook Drive Wall Improvements, Grading and
Drainage to Northstar Construction, Inc. in the amount of $113,850.
D.8 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-066 AWARDING THE BID
FOR THE SCREEN WALLS BETWEEN JOSEY LANE AND BAY MEADOW
CIRCLE AND ALONG MAYBROOK DRIVE TO SUPERIOR CONCRETE
PRODUCTS AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The 2000-2001 Non-Bond
Capital Improvement Program Amended Budget provides $195,000 to replace the
screen wall and repair the concrete channel along Maybrook Drive, and $75,000
to replace the screen wall between Josey Lane and Baymeadow Circle. The two
projects were combined and bid under one contract in March 2001. The low bid
exceeded the funds available by $84,300. The bids were rejected. The
improvements were rebid under two separate contracts. One contract is the
installation of new screen walls along Maybrook Drive and between Josey Lane
and Baymeadow Circle. The other contract, which is another item on this agenda,
is the drainage improvements associated with the Maybrook Drive screen wall.
After expenditures for design, geotechnical investigation, materials testing and the
drainage improvements associated with the Maybook Drive screen wall, there is a
total of $125,200 available for the installation of the screen walls.
Six bids were received and opened on July 3, 2001. All bids received met
specifications. The low bid was submitted by Superior Concrete Products in an
amount of $165,365 and has provided adequate qualifications and references for
similar work. The contract time is 150 calendar days.
An additional $49,065 is needed to fully fund the improvements. The additional
funds are available in the Non-bond Capital Improvement Program Fund
Contingencies.
By rebidding the improvements under two separate contacts, the cost of the
improvements was reduced $35,235 from the March 2001 bid.
The City Engineer recommends adopting Resolution No. 2001-066 awarding the
bid for the Screen Walls along Josey Lane/Bay Meadow Circle and Maybrook
Drive to Superior Concrete Products in an amount of $165,365.
Volume 87, page 18
Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked what kind of brick would be used. Mr. Murawski
replied the city would be using pre-cast concrete panels that the residents on Bay
Meadows have seen.
Mayor Pro Tern Davis asked if this would make the lady living on Bay Meadow
happy. Mr. Murawski replied yes.
Councilman Bird asked what kind of warranty would there be on the screening
walls. Mr. Murawski replied he did not have that information with him but would
obtain it and give Council a copy.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Walden, seconded by
Councilman Robbs, all voting "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-066 awarding
the bid for the screen walls along Josey Lane/Bay Meadow Circle and Maybrook
Drive to Superior Concrete Products in an amount of $165,365.
D.9 CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2001-062 AWARDING THE BID
FOR THE HUTTON DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION TO MCMAHON
CONTRACTING, L.P. AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. The 2000-2001 Non-bond
Capital Improvement Program Amended Budget provides $1,000,000 for the
reconstruction of Hutton Drive from Diplomat Drive to the north city limit line.
This section of Hutton Drive is being reconstructed because the existing concrete
pavement is in very poor condition and it is not cost effective to rehabilitate with
concrete repairs and resurfacing. After expenditures for design and materials
testing, there is $926,000 available for construction.
Eight bids were received and opened on July 5, 2001. All bids received met
specifications. McMahon Contracting, LP in an amount of $813,545, submitted
the low bid. McMahon Contracting has provided adequate qualifications and
references for similar work. The contract time is 240 calendar days.
The City Engineer recommends adopting Resolution No. 2001-062 awarding the
bid for the reconstruction of Hutton Drive to McMahon Contracting, LP in an
amount of $813,545.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, asked if the cost of this project is
consistent with the cost per square yard of other similar projects. Mr. Murawski
replied this project is very consistent with other similar projects.
Ms. Crockett asked Mr. Murawski if he had a cost per square yard. Mr.
Murawski replied he did not have that information.
Mayor Phelps stated it would be 12,650 square yards.
Volume 87, page 19
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Robbs, seconded by
Councilman Walden all voting, "aye," adopted Resolution No. 2001-062
awarding the bid for the reconstruction of Hutton Drive to McMahon Contracting,
LP in an amount of $813,545.
D.10 CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION
AND RESTORATION BOARD, SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD AND THE
SCHOOL-COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMITTEE AND TAKE
APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps presented the following information. There is a vacancy on the
Historical Preservation and Restoration Board due to the resignation of Laverne
Gilbert. This term will expire on 1/1/03.
Mayor Phelps stated this item would be postponed until the September 10, 2001,
City Council meeting.
There being no further discussion, a motion by Councilman Moses, seconded by
Councilman Robbs, all voting "aye," reappointed Helen Bowling, Elva Zombola,
Allen Johnson, Melvin Long, Jimmie May to the Senior Advisory Board for
another term.
The School-Community Relations Committee has six vacant positions from
members who have resigned.
Mayor Phelps stated this item would be postponed until the September 10, 2001,
City Council meeting.
D.11 CONSIDER COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORTS AND REQUESTS AND TAKE
APPROPRIATE ACTION.
Mayor Phelps stated he attended the Texas Municipal League, Association of
Mayor Councilmembers and Commissioners Institute in Wichita Falls on July 19-
21, 2001. He stated he and Hong Sae, Manager of Information Services, were
asked to speak on a panel entitled "Half Disk Will Travel," the paperless agenda,
which Farmers Branch is in the process of implementing. He stated other
participants were Gary Guy of Southlake, City Secretary of Sugarland, and the
moderator was Mayor Lonnie Folis of Mont Belvieu, Texas.
Mayor Phelps stated the session was well attended and he complimented Hong
Sae for an outstanding presentation.
Mr. Escalante stated there have been a number of cities throughout the state that
have asked about the new agenda program, wanting to purchase it from the City.
Mr. Escalante stated the City is working with a third party to look at what the
City's options are and this will be brought back to Council in the near future.
Volume 87, page 20
Councilman Bird stated by using the new agenda system the City is saving paper,
and the City is also using recycled paper for garbage sacks and saving many trees.
Councilman Walden asked with the new agenda system how is staff better
utilized. Mr. Escalante replied that a report was prepared and he will be
forwarding it on to the City Council.
Mayor Phelps commented that on the City's agenda system the entire year is on a
single disk.
A motion by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, seconded by Councilman Walden, all voting
"aye," approved travel for City Manager, Mayor and City Council to travel to
Texas Municipal League Annual Conference in Houston on November 28 through
30, and National League of Cities Annual Conference in Atlanta, Georgia on
December 4 through 8, 2001.
D.12 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION.
William Timmons, 13855 Birchlawn, recounted his story of being arrested for
carrying a firearm on to an airplane.
James Stigers, 12304 Wood Manor Circle, stated he has been a resident of
Farmers Branch for six years. He stated he and his family appreciate Farmers
Branch and all its amenities. He thinks the Council does an excellent job.
Charles Williams, 2508 Richland, commended the Council on Branch Crossing
but wished it had been in his neighborhood. He stated the Council made an
excellent purchase on the property on Valley View and Denton, and made a lot of
money on the sale of the property. In addition, he felt Mr. Brown did get to the
City on the reroofing of the Victorian House but stated that happens sometimes.
Betty Supinski, 13232 Kerr Trail, asked about the sign in Kerr Trail Park, who
approved it, and who is paying for it.
Mr. Escalante stated Mr. Fuller would get with her after the meeting.
Beth Crockett, 2702 Mount View Drive, read a statement disagreeing with the
statements made by various Councilmembers, in regard to citizen participation in
the Farmers Branch city government.
Kathleen Matsumura, 3938 Clubway, reviewed her involvement in activities in
the City of Farmers Branch, including the electoral process.
David Redwine, 3941 High Summit, expressed his belief that other amenities
besides expensive homes make people want to live in Farmers Branch.
Volume 87, page 21
Gaile Gatcomb, 2638 Farmers Branch Lane, stated she felt that residents are not
getting what they want and there is lack of communication between the City and
the residents. She commented that the City was recently polling the Farmers
Branch Lane residents concerning sidewalks. She stated she was present to let the
Council know that the Farmers Branch Lane residents do not want sidewalks.
D.13 PRESENTATION OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND ORGANIZATION
REPORTS.
Mayor Phelps stated in the last month he has attended the Dallas Regional
Mobility Coalition, and the North Central Texas Council of Government Board of
Directors Meetings.
Mayor Phelps stated he also attended the Texas 2001 Transportation Summit
meeting in Irving on August 15 through August 17, 2001. He stated the mayors
in the area were co-hosting the meeting. Mayor Phelps stated Texas 2001
Transportation Summit is a coalition of local governments from around the state
trying to get more tax dollars returned to Texas.
MAYOR PHELPS ANNOUNCED THAT THE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA FOR THE
EXECUTIVE SESSION WERE DISCUSSED IN THE 4:00 P.M. WORK SESSION.
MAYOR PHELPS EXPLAINED THE CITY COUNCIL CONVENED INTO
EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:39 P.M. AND CONCLUDED AT 7:22 P.M.. TEXAS
GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 551 OF THE OPEN MEETING LAW PROVIDES
THAT SUCH ITEMS AS PERSONNEL MATTERS, LAND ACQUISITION AND
PENDING AND CONTEMPLATED LITIGATION MAY BE DISCUSSED IN
CLOSED SESSION.
Executive Session
E.1 Discuss pending and contemplated litigation - Texas Government Code Section
551.071.
Discuss litigation relative to R.C. Small and an agreement with R.C. Small and
Associates, Inc. and take appropriate action.
Mayor Phelps explained staff was present to discuss this item with the City
Council.
E.2 Discuss land acquisition - Texas Government Code Section 551.072.
1. Discuss sale of City owned property located at the northwest corner of
Valley View and Keenan Bridge Road and take appropriate action.
Volume 87, page 22
2. Discuss land acquisition of property located near the northwest corner of
Valley View Lane and Hutton Drive (Alfred Circle) and take appropriate
action.
Mayor Phelps explained staff was present to discuss this item with the City
Council.
F.1 Consider necessary action on items discussed in the Executive Session.
Mayor Phelps stated Staff updated the City Council on pending litigation and land
acquisition and no action was necessary.
F.2 Adjournment.
A motion by Councilman Bird, a second by Mayor Pro Tern Davis, all voting
"aye ' urne e City Council meeting of August 20, 2001 at 10:55 p.m.
Mayor
U '
r
City Secretary
Volume 87, page 23